Not all couples can separate their differences from the best interests of their children when they are in the middle of a divorce. Accusations may fly back and forth until it takes a court intervention and the evaluation of professionals to sort out the truth. When one or both parent's ability to care for the children is being evaluated, both sides need to be informed about the psychological testing child custody judges order.
Parents question why they are being evaluated. When parents are making accusations about one another's parenting skills, a judge will bring in a mental health professional to evaluate how well the individuals are functioning. The court will want to know whether the parents are capable of sharing responsibilities regarding the children, or if the children need to have one adult appointed the primary caregiver. Judges want to ensure the children are safe.
Parents often question how important the psychological tests are in deciding custodial arrangements. Most psychologists will say that the tests are just a part of what they look at when making their evaluations. They also base their findings on observation, interviews, parent-child interaction, teachers, and others who might be able to shed light on the family dynamic.
If one of the parents gets an unfavorable evaluation, they want to know what comes next. The lawyers explain that they contact the psychologist to discuss the findings prior to the filing of the report. They want to know in advance whether the news is good or bad. When it's not favorable, the lawyer only has a couple of options. An new expert may be requested. The judge is likely to this down though, because courts do not like children being evaluated multiple times.
Parents want to know if there is room for compromise if neither parent is deemed especially problematic. Psychologists say that they sometimes work with families for months in order to really get to know the inner workings of the family. They study everything that is relevant. When an issue is outside their area of expertise, it is incumbent upon them to call upon another professional to come in and assess that situation.
Couples ask what happens when both sides get their own evaluators. Both the lawyers and psychologists say this is something that happens all the time. Most of the time the conclusions reached are pretty much the same. It is fairly rare for psychologists to be biased in favor of the parents who are paying them.
Some parents want to know if children can be compelled to visit an alienated parent. The answer to this question depends on the circumstances. In most cases, judges don't like to try and force children to spend time with the alienated parent because it tends to make the situation worse. In a case where one parent is not cooperating with visitation, the court may decide to intervene before that situation worsens.
Divorce is hard, no matter how amicable it may be. It is always in everyone's best interest to work out custody arrangements privately. When the parents are at each other's throats, the courts will step in and take control. This should not be anybody's first choice.
Parents question why they are being evaluated. When parents are making accusations about one another's parenting skills, a judge will bring in a mental health professional to evaluate how well the individuals are functioning. The court will want to know whether the parents are capable of sharing responsibilities regarding the children, or if the children need to have one adult appointed the primary caregiver. Judges want to ensure the children are safe.
Parents often question how important the psychological tests are in deciding custodial arrangements. Most psychologists will say that the tests are just a part of what they look at when making their evaluations. They also base their findings on observation, interviews, parent-child interaction, teachers, and others who might be able to shed light on the family dynamic.
If one of the parents gets an unfavorable evaluation, they want to know what comes next. The lawyers explain that they contact the psychologist to discuss the findings prior to the filing of the report. They want to know in advance whether the news is good or bad. When it's not favorable, the lawyer only has a couple of options. An new expert may be requested. The judge is likely to this down though, because courts do not like children being evaluated multiple times.
Parents want to know if there is room for compromise if neither parent is deemed especially problematic. Psychologists say that they sometimes work with families for months in order to really get to know the inner workings of the family. They study everything that is relevant. When an issue is outside their area of expertise, it is incumbent upon them to call upon another professional to come in and assess that situation.
Couples ask what happens when both sides get their own evaluators. Both the lawyers and psychologists say this is something that happens all the time. Most of the time the conclusions reached are pretty much the same. It is fairly rare for psychologists to be biased in favor of the parents who are paying them.
Some parents want to know if children can be compelled to visit an alienated parent. The answer to this question depends on the circumstances. In most cases, judges don't like to try and force children to spend time with the alienated parent because it tends to make the situation worse. In a case where one parent is not cooperating with visitation, the court may decide to intervene before that situation worsens.
Divorce is hard, no matter how amicable it may be. It is always in everyone's best interest to work out custody arrangements privately. When the parents are at each other's throats, the courts will step in and take control. This should not be anybody's first choice.
About the Author:
You can get valuable tips on how to choose a psychologist and more information about a professional who offers psychological testing child custody purposes at http://www.drjamesrflens.com now.
0 comments:
Post a Comment